One of the topics we keep returning to on Date Night, or on those other rare occasions when unfettered adult conversation can occur, is whether or not to push the kids in a particular direction, for which reasons, and how hard.
For example, let's say you introduce your daughter to swim lessons, and she enjoys them. Now let's say that the coach comes to you one day and says, "You know, Mathilda there has some real talent. You should enroll her in my "L'il Dolphins competitive swim team." You ask Mathilda, and she's game, so you pull her form community swim lessons and put her onto the team.
For a while she loves it - new people, excellent coaches, one-on-one attention, the thrill of competing. However, after a few months, the shine rubs off the practices and she starts complaining that it's "boring". Also, that it is "hard" and "no fun". Mathilda goes to a few meets. She wins a race in her first one, but finishes middle-on-the-pack in the others. It turns out the other kids are also pretty good, and have been at it longer than she.
Now her resistance grows and you begin to have fights with her over going to practice, and meets, and her bad attitude, and you remind her she made a commitment to the team and the coaches and that members of this family never quit.
But then, over some Thai food on Date Night, you and your husband talk it through - Mathilda is just being lazy. She needs to learn the value of pushing through adversity to succeed in life. Her commitment to the team is a promise that should not be broken.
...Or maybe she has swum long enough now that she had concluded she really does not like being in the pool. Perhaps she also needs to learn when to stop banging her head against a wall and to walk away gracefully. It is also possible that she did not really understand the implications of her "sure, I'll join a team" when asked.
What do you do, as parents? Exposing your children to a variety of activities as they grow seems to make good sense. Providing them with the opportunity to pursue those activities that they enjoy and have some aptitude for also makes sense. But here's where it gets tricky - and where you need to ask yourself what your ultimate goals are - with the activity specifically, and for your kids' growth overall.
Success at any level requires a significant commitment and considerable sacrifice of time, energy and passion. Can 9-year-old Mathilda really comprehend the significance of that sacrifice and commitment? I'd say no. Therefore, as the parent(s), do you push them to break through their initial resistance so that they can take their skills to the next level? If so, at what cost? How do you identify the point at which the cost to the child and the family is greater than the likely outcome down the road? Very difficult calculus to do.
While I have no actual data on this, I'd venture that every single Olympic champion or concert pianist or successful business owner would say that they would not have made it to the top without someone helping to push them up there - to keep them focused and driven and on-point.
Again, as a parent you have to ask what your goals are - are you training a concert pianist or Olympic swimmer? Or are you trying to mold a well-rounded kid who is solid at many things, but maybe not excellent at any one? Let me be clear, I am not saying one is better than the other, just that the question should be asked - and answered - so that you know where an activity, and your parenting, is heading.
As long as the atmosphere on the team is supportive and positive I think I would have Mathilda stick out the season because of the commitment aspect but then call it quits. But then I'm also assuming that a "season" is a reasonable amount of time...a few months...not the whole academic year.
ReplyDeleteThese questions are much more complex for our kids now because there really isn't an easy way to dabble in activities -- particularly sports. Soccer is all year, not just in the fall, tennis requires indoor winter lessons, swimming is all year. In order to have a chance to participate on most HIGH SCHOOL teams (IMHO forget college unless you're an absolutely star) kids are pushed to specialize --and potentially burn out-- very, very early. And because so many things require year-long commitments, to have a broad range of experiences often leads to over scheduling..
You make a good point regarding the year-round focus that is required at an early age in order to progress. While it feels to me like "they are starting younger and younger!" and "why can't kids just be kids these days?", I have the feeling that actually it has always been this way. In order to go beyond 'good' to 'great', you need to specialize, and the earlier the better.
ReplyDeleteIn David Shenk's book, "The Immortal Game: A History of Chess", he discusses the eternal question of talent verses practice:
"...looking closely at genius-level achievement, psychologists have also established that there is an overwhelming correlation between mentoring and practice." pg.131
Shenks goes on to quote, "'Evidence for the contribution of talent over and above practice has proved extremely elusive,' writes University College of London profewssor David R. Shanks. In contrast, he says, 'evidence is now emerging that exceptional performance in memory, chess, music, sports and other arenas can be fully accounted for on the basis of an age-old adage: practice makes perfect.'"
I think you end up having to ask yourself as a parent, "What do I want for my child," and, "what does my child want for him/herself?"
Unfortunately, these are very difficult questions to answer clearly!